🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a proposed legislation that include decreasing the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid broader worries about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Recently, global health authorities issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of corporate influence worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” said Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, delayed for at least one year after the bill passes.

The WHO actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for multiple violations “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia states the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but claims that “specific rules can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We live in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are dying … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator said: “The corporation runs its activities following with applicable local laws. Moreover, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which provide for relevant group engagement in regulation development.”

The company was “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, adding that minors should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to realize planned public health goals, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” they said, mentioning that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which encompasses growing volumes of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.